Showing posts with label greed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label greed. Show all posts

December 1, 2011

"When the rich wage war, it's the poor who die"

"If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich."  ~John F. Kennedy

"What is most important for democracy is not that great fortunes should not exist, but that great fortunes should not remain in the same hands. In that way there are rich men, but they do not form a class."  ~Alexis de Tocqueville


This is a must-read op-ed at Bloomberg, written by a man who founded many companies and last year raked in an eight-figure income (on which he only paid 11% in taxes).

I think he knows whereof he speaks.

Even so, I’ve never been a “job creator.” I can start a business based on a great idea, and initially hire dozens or hundreds of people. But if no one can afford to buy what I have to sell, my business will soon fail and all those jobs will evaporate. 


That’s why I can say with confidence that rich people don’t create jobs, nor do businesses, large or small. What does lead to more employment is the feedback loop between customers and businesses. And only consumers can set in motion a virtuous cycle that allows companies to survive and thrive and business owners to hire. An ordinary middle-class consumer is far more of a job creator than I ever have been or ever will be.

This is why it's so stupid when Republicans blather on about "job-killing tax hikes." It's not taxes or the lack thereof that create jobs--it's demand for your widgets, or whatever you happen to be offering. No demand=no business=no jobs. (I'm certain all these small businesses they're so hot on protecting just decided one day that x amount of people in their depressed little towns needed a job, so they just up and hired all these people, regardless of whether they thought anyone would actually purchase what the employees were selling. Suuuuure.)

I don't know why Mitch McConnell and his merry band of Nazguls in Congress continue to cling to this ridiculous myth. I suppose it's all of a piece with their sticking to their story of trickle-down economics and denying climate change. They're so terrified that their patently false way of life might have to change that they'll hang on to it to the bitter end, irregardless of common sense or facts.

It is mathematically impossible to invest enough in our economy and our country to sustain the middle class (our customers) without taxing the top 1 percent at reasonable levels again. Shifting the burden from the 99 percent to the 1 percent is the surest and best way to get our consumer-based economy rolling again. 


Significant tax increases on the about $1.5 trillion in collective income of those of us in the top 1 percent could create hundreds of billions of dollars to invest in our economy, rather than letting it pile up in a few bank accounts like a huge clot in our nation’s economic circulatory system.

No matter how much you jump up and down and throw a hissy fit, math is still math. Remember the 1950's? That wondrous decade all these traditional types look back on as the nadir of American society (at least for white Christian males)?

What were the tax rates then, pray tell?


Admittedly these are marginal tax rates. The actual tax rate paid, with loopholes and deductions and such, was probably around 50%.

Nevertheless, the country didn't crash and burn, now did it? With the way the Republican Nazguls are screaming, you'd think President Obama is wielding the One Ring and dragging them back to Mount Doom.

One Tax to rule them all,
One Tax to find them,
One Tax to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the land of Socialists where the Kenyans lie.

(back to article) So let’s give a break to the true job creators. Let’s tax the rich like we once did and use that money to spur growth by putting purchasing power back in the hands of the middle class. And let’s remember that capitalists without customers are out of business.

And capitalism without proper taxation is the country we have today--a godawful, unequal, top-heavy mess.





April 21, 2011

For Me, But Not For Thee

Well, isn't this a fine how-do-you-do.

According to The Raw Story:

Paul Ryan already benefited from the Social Security fund he now wants to gut.

The senator's father died when he was sixteen. For the next two years, he received Social Security survivor benefits--benefits that enabled him to go to college, earn two degrees (economics and political science), land a Congressional internship, ascend to the top spot in the Budget Committee...and cripple the very program that started him on his way.

Shall I dub thee "monumental hypocrite?"

Seriously, folks, this is what Social Security does. It's not just for old farts anymore, and it never was. Their Top Services: Apply for Benefits page lists these available services.

Retirement, spouses and/or Medicare benefits

Survivors benefits
Disability benefits
For a child
For an adult
Child's benefits
Parents benefits
Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
For a child
For an adult with a disability
For an adult age 65 or older

This is a program that benefits all the American people, and we all pay for it. Willingly so, in most cases...certainly in mine.

And the Republicans want to gut it.

I think we're facing a crucial moment as a country. Do we want to remain the America we know, the compassionate America that takes care of its own? Or do we want to turn into a heartless corporate dictatorship that throws its worker-slaves under the bridge when they can't work anymore?

Take a look at which political party wants to turn America into Koch-istan...and vote accordingly.

April 20, 2011

Take the New Pledge for Austerity!

I saw this is one of Paul Krugman's comments today (and I can't find the post now; Krugman generates intelligent discourse like Andrew Breitbart spouts inanities--too many to keep up) .

The New Pledge of Allegiance

I pledge allegiance,
To the logo,
Of the United Corporations of America,
And to the greed,
For which it stands,
One nation,
Under Mammon,
So divisible,
With usury and debt for all.

"Poorhouses" would also fit in the last line, and scan a little better, I think.

(Incidentally, if you look up the history of English poorhouses, it's a scary thing. See here and here. What's most frightening is that I can see this country heading down that road, if Republicans get their way.)