This is the second movie made from one of Andy Weir's books, after 2015's The Martian. The settings are different, but the plots are similar: someone faced with a near-insurmountable problem he has to science his way out of. The stakes are a little higher in this one: The Martian's Mark Watney was an astronaut stranded on Mars all by his lonesome, who would have starved had the world not pulled together to rescue him. In contrast, Hail Mary's Ryland Grace has to solve the problem of an alien "astrophage" that is colonizing and dimming the sun, the consequence of which will be the freezing of Earth and the extinction of the human race and all life on the planet if he cannot figure out a way to stop it.
(Yeah, no pressure, right? Also, another similarity is the main character: a Competent White Guy. Of course, Andy Weir is a White Guy, so that's what he wrote. The layers surrounding this are an entirely different conversation, however, one I am not having right now.)
I saw this film in a giant IMAX theater, and let me start by saying it is gorgeous. The colors are crisp and clear, and the practical sets--there doesn't seem to be much CGI in this, except obviously for the exterior space shots--are well designed and much appreciated. It's a good thing Ryan Gosling makes an excellent Ryland Grace, the science teacher forced into the role of astronaut and savior of humanity (and other beings) because he is on the screen nearly one hundred percent of the time. It's a very good performance throughout. Unfortunately, the Academy tends to overlook lead actors in SF films come award time (although with Michael B. Jordan's Best Actor win this year for Sinners, one hopes that might be changing), but I wonder if the studio will make a push for a Best Actor nomination for Gosling next year. As far as I am concerned, his performance deserves it.
I am aware there's been some rumblings about inaccurate science in this film. In particular, PZ Myers at Pharyngula tossed off a disgruntled--nay, disgusted--post on the subject. (Short version: the premise is garbage and the movie is fucking stupid.) Of course, this view is perfectly valid, as he's looking at the film from the perspective of a scientist and evolutionary biologist. I'm sure movies such a viewpoint can approve of are few and far between.
However, that's not how I'm looking at it. Look, I read a lot of SF every year, and I've resigned myself to the fact that nearly every science fiction book and story I read is going to have inaccurate science, to a greater or lesser degree. I'm personally fond of space opera stories, and one of the central tenets of that genre--FTL travel--is not allowed by the laws of physics as we currently understand them. That doesn't stop me from loving well-written space operas (a recent example: Claire North's fantastic Slow Gods, with her extradimensional "arcspace"). My "fucking stupid" boundaries are different than PZ's, but I definitely have them. (Just ask me how stupid Independence Day: Resurgence was. 🙄)
For me, however, this film does not cross those boundaries.
That's because the plot of Project Hail Mary and the story are to me two different things. The plot is A to B to C, this happens and causes D effect, and then E happens; or, X problem pops up and is solved, leading to Y problem, and then the big ZZ problem at the climax. But that's not the story.
The story is this:
1) Ryland Grace's friendship with Rocky the alien; and
2) As a direct result of that friendship, how Ryland grows from a milquetoast, non-confrontational, even cowardly person to a person who will take his ship to rescue his friend, his own life be damned.
That's the story, and Project Hail Mary delivers.
Viewed from this perspective, the movie is as much a character study as it is an SF blockbuster. I mean, you have a guy who is terrified at the idea of going into space, who is so scared that during the flashback scene after the scientist on the three-person Hail Mary team is killed, and Ryland is the only one availble to meet the extremely tight launch window--never mind that he's not an astronaut--and if he refuses he is literally dooming the human race to death in thirty years--even then, he says no over and over again, stating "I don't have it in me," and they have to chase him down, drug him, and drag him aboard the Hail Mary. (Which is not a great look for the mission commander, but really, what else could she do? She was also trusting Ryland not to slit his wrists when he woke up aboard the Hail Mary and realized what had been done to him.)
But as one of the key lines in the film proclaims (paraphrasing): "You can be brave if you find someone to be brave for," and this is what happens to Ryland Grace. His relationship with Rocky (I'm almost cringing at the thought of calling it an "alien bromance," but that's exactly what it is), enables him to first, solve the astrophage problem; and secondly, after he and Rocky part and Ryland realizes the solution to the problem will infect Rocky's ship, strand him in space, and lead to his slow death by radiation exposure and starvation, Ryland makes the film's central choice. He loads his data and the engineered astrophage predators onto four probes (named John, Paul, George and Ringo after the Beatles) and sends them on their way to Earth; and knowing he doesn't have enough fuel to get home if he goes to rescue Rocky....he takes off to rescue Rocky anyway.
Personally, I can overlook a lot of bad science for a story like that. Yes, Ryland, you did have it in you after all.
This film is a box-office hit, and it deserves to be. If, like PZ Myers, you can't get past the bad science, that's fine. But I think you're missing out on someting special.








